A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Scoring · Founding fathers

Hamilton, Alexander
1755–1804

3
Margin
T +4

Hamilton was the founders' strongest advocate for federal power, banking regulation, manufacturing, urban-commercial pragmatism, and pro-immigration (he himself arrived in NYC at 17 as a Caribbean immigrant); his Federalist Papers are the definitive constitutional defense of energetic federal government. He spent his career warning against demagogues who would exploit popular sentiment against institutions — most famously in his 1804 letters opposing Aaron Burr, calling Burr 'a dangerous man, and one who ought not to be trusted with the reins of government.' Paxton's populist-demagogic mode is exactly what Hamilton warned against; the anti-immigration position is incoherent with Hamilton's biography; the personal-attack campaign style would horrify the man who died in a duel triggered by exactly such attacks. Talarico's strong federal economic policy, pro-trade restoration, pro-immigration framework, anti-faction approach, infrastructure investment, and Hamiltonian banking-regulation align well with Hamilton's actual record. He drops some points on anti-billionaire framing — Hamilton was the founders' most explicit defender of moneyed-class economic dynamism as essential to American power.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers (1787-1788) Nos. 1, 6-9, 11-13, 15-17, 21-36, 59-61, 65-85; Report on Manufactures (1791); Report on Public Credit (1790); critique of Aaron Burr (1804 letters). (full list)