A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Wall Street Journal Editorial Board portrait
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

Wall Street Journal Editorial Board

Via Wikimedia Commons.

WSJ ed board: pro-free-trade, pro-markets, pro-legal-immigration, hawkish on Russia/China, institutionalist, critical of MAGA. The board essentially predicted Trump's endorsement of Paxton would deserve 'complete and total credit' if it costs the GOP the seat.16 Paxton wins on taxes, deregulation, energy, and crypto but loses heavily on tariffs, corruption, Ukraine, and AG-record chaos. Talarico is too far left on taxes, Medicare buy-in, and minimum wage but earns credit on anti-corruption, trade, and alliance restoration. Cornyn isn't on the ballot.

3
Margin
T +1
Issue
Paxton
Talarico
Tax cuts / free markets
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
The board's supply-side core wants low rates; Paxton backs tax cuts1, while Talarico supports raising the corporate rate and a billionaire-tax framework.
Deregulation
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
The board wants a lighter regulatory hand; Paxton's AG record is consistently anti-rulemaking1, while Talarico backs expanded federal regulatory authority.
Energy / crypto framework
Helps
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: —
The board favors a permissive energy and digital-assets regulatory framework; Paxton's record is pro-oil-and-gas and pro-crypto1. Talarico has not built a clear crypto position and is a non-factor here.
Trump tariffs / free trade
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
The board is fiercely anti-tariff; Paxton has echoed Trump tariff support1, while Talarico backs tariff repeal — the rare case where the Democrat lands closer to the WSJ.
Pro-legal-immigration
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
The board has long defended legal immigration; Paxton has sued to end DACA and prioritized enforcement-only1, while Talarico backs comprehensive reform.
Hawkish on Russia/China / Ukraine support
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
The board is reliably hawkish on Russia and pro-Ukraine; Paxton's MAGA-aligned posture cuts against Ukraine aid1, while Talarico's explicit Ukraine-aid support and China-hawkish chip-export-controls position land him on the WSJ-hawk side of this row.
Institutional corruption / AG-record chaos
Hurts
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: —
The board's institutionalism makes Paxton's impeachment, settled 2024 securities case, and forum-shopping a primary disqualifier — the board predicted Trump's endorsement would deserve 'complete and total credit' for any GOP loss of the seat16. Talarico carries no comparable record.
Alliance restoration
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
The board values stable U.S. alliances; Talarico backs alliance restoration directly, while Paxton's MAGA-aligned skepticism of NATO and traditional alliance commitments1 runs against the board's alliance-stability framework.
Anti-corruption framing
Helps
Paxton: — · Talarico: Helps
Even on a left-of-WSJ platform, the board credits anti-corruption posture; Talarico's institutional-integrity edge is the reason the board would 'hold its nose' toward him over Paxton.
Medicare buy-in
Hurts
Paxton: — · Talarico: Hurts
The board opposes single-payer-leaning expansions of federal health programs; Talarico's Medicare buy-in at any age is exactly the policy the board critiques. Paxton aligns with the board — opposed1 — and is not a factor.
Minimum-wage hikes
Hurts
Paxton: — · Talarico: Hurts
The board's supply-side stance opposes federal wage mandates; Talarico backs a $15 federal minimum. Paxton aligns with the board1 and is unaffected.
Cornyn-as-preferred-candidate signal
Hurts
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: —
The board's preferred Texas senator (Cornyn) isn't on the November ballot, and the board's editorial line has framed the Paxton primary win as the GOP throwing away a winnable seat29. Talarico is the residual beneficiary of that frame but the credit belongs under the institutional-integrity row.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Wall Street Journal editorial board, referenced by Bret Baier on Fox News 'Special Report,' May 20, 2026: Trump 'will deserve complete and total credit' if Paxton wins primary and loses to Talarico. (full list)
  3. Brit Hume on Fox News 'Special Report,' May 20, 2026, citing WSJ editorial on electoral risk. (full list)
  4. The Hill, 'Sen. Susan Collins slams Donald Trump's Texas Senate endorsement of Ken Paxton,' May 19, 2026. (full list)