Forbes — the 'Capitalist Tool' founded by B.C. Forbes in 1917 — centers free markets, entrepreneurship as moral good, tax reduction (the Steve Forbes flat-tax legacy), deregulation, pro-trade, property rights, and pro-immigrant-entrepreneurship (the magazine regularly celebrates immigrant founders in its '30 Under 30' and 'Forbes 400' coverage). Paxton wins on tax cuts, deregulation, and anti-ESG litigation (Forbes has been openly skeptical of ESG mandates) but loses substantially on tariffs (Forbes has run extensive anti-tariff coverage), anti-immigration positioning (Forbes celebrates the immigrant-entrepreneur tradition), personal scandals (corporate-governance failures are generally disqualifying in Forbes's framework), and the litigation chaos that disrupts business planning. Talarico wins on tariff repeal, comprehensive immigration reform with entrepreneurship pathways, anti-corruption institutional stability, and alliance restoration (Forbes is broadly pro-globalization). Talarico loses on the $15 federal minimum wage, corporate tax increases, stock-buyback tax, billionaire-taxation framing, and the broader anti-wealth rhetoric Forbes treats as antithetical to its founding ethos. The narrow T+1 margin is itself informative — Forbes is one of the few graders where both candidates have substantial conflicts with the framework, unlike the WSJ ed board (also T+1) which weighs institutional integrity more heavily, or Buffett (T+3) who is more tolerant of progressive-taxation framing.
Sources
- Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
- Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
- Forbes magazine ('Capitalist Tool'), founded 1917 by B.C. Forbes; Steve Forbes flat-tax presidential campaigns (1996, 2000); Forbes editorial coverage of tariffs as anti-growth, immigrant-entrepreneur celebration (annual 'Forbes 400' and '30 Under 30'), and skepticism of ESG mandates. (full list)