A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

Cato Institute

4
Margin
T +1

Cato favors free markets, free trade, civil liberties, criminal-justice reform, drug-policy reform, dovish foreign policy, executive-power skepticism, and pro-legal (often near-open) immigration. Paxton wins on tax cuts, deregulation, Second Amendment, school choice, and anti-ESG; loses on drug-war enforcement (Cato has been clear: prohibition fails), forum-shopping abuse of AG power, Trump tariffs, and DACA lawsuits. Talarico wins on marijuana legalization, criminal-justice reform, immigration reform, anti-corruption, free-trade restoration, civil liberties, and church-state separation. He loses on minimum-wage hikes, Medicare buy-in, billionaire tax frameworks, and repealing Citizens United (Cato generally opposes campaign-finance restrictions on speech grounds). Genuine split, narrow edge to Talarico on liberty-of-the-person issues.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. Texas Attorney General, 'Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Five Cities Over Marijuana Policies,' Jan. 2024; lawsuit against Dallas Proposition R, Nov. 2024. (full list)