How They DifferPaxton · Talarico 2026
A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Texas Farm Bureau portrait
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

Texas Farm Bureau

Via Wikimedia Commons.
Official site →

The Texas Farm Bureau endorsed Cornyn (not Paxton) in this race — itself a strong signal. Core priorities: agricultural trade access, farm-labor pathways, water rights, property rights, rural healthcare, estate-tax repeal. Paxton wins on estate tax, deregulation, property rights, and water rights but loses on tariffs (cotton, beef, dairy), farm-labor immigration, and rural hospitals. Talarico wins on tariff repeal, rural investment, rural hospitals, and ag-labor pathways but loses on estate tax, ag wages, and regulatory expansion.

Paxton
4
Talarico
5
Margin
T +1
Issue
Paxton
Talarico
Cornyn endorsement signal
Hurts
—
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: —
The Texas Farm Bureau endorsed Cornyn in this race rather than Paxton26, which is itself a strong negative signal on Paxton. Talarico was not under consideration in a GOP primary endorsement and is not a factor here.
Estate-tax repeal
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
The Bureau treats the estate tax as a threat to multigenerational family farms; Paxton supports repeal3, while Talarico's wealth-tax framework cuts the opposite way2.
Property rights
Helps
—
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: —
The Bureau prioritizes landowner property rights; Paxton's AG record defends them1. Talarico has not built a property-rights agenda in conflict with this and is not a factor.
Water rights
Helps
—
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: —
The Bureau defends groundwater and surface-water property rights for Texas producers; Paxton's office has actively litigated to protect them1. Talarico has not engaged on water-rights doctrine and is not a factor.
Regulatory rollback
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
The Bureau treats EPA and labor-rule expansion as a threat to ag operations; Paxton's AG record is consistently anti-rulemaking1, while Talarico backs expanded federal regulatory authority2.
Trump tariffs / ag trade access
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Texas is the top exporting state and cotton, beef, and dairy all take retaliatory hits under Trump tariffs; Paxton has echoed Trump tariff support3, while Talarico backs tariff repeal2 — a huge issue for Texas ag.
Farm-labor immigration pathway
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
The Bureau needs a workable legal-immigration pathway for farm and dairy labor; Paxton has prioritized enforcement-only3, while Talarico backs comprehensive reform with ag-labor pathways2.
Rural-hospital protection
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Rural healthcare access is a long-running Bureau concern; Paxton's Medicaid-litigation posture1 has not protected rural hospitals, while Talarico has campaigned on rural-hospital funding2.
Rural investment
—
Helps
Paxton: — · Talarico: Helps
The Bureau wants federal investment in broadband, roads, and ag support; Talarico has pushed rural-focused proposals2. Paxton has not made rural infrastructure a campaign issue and is not a factor on the upside.
Minimum-wage hikes (ag wages)
—
Hurts
Paxton: — · Talarico: Hurts
A $15 federal minimum lands hard on row-crop and dairy labor costs; Talarico backs $152. Paxton aligns with the Bureau in opposing it1 and is unaffected.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. Gabby Birenbaum, 'On the issues: A Q&A with Ken Paxton and John Cornyn,' Texas Tribune, April 20, 2026. (full list)
  4. Cornyn campaign endorsements page; Texas Tribune Q&A endorsements list, April 2026. (full list)

Others in this cluster