A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

National Review (Buckley fusionism)

3
Margin
tie

NR was founded in 1955 to 'stand athwart history yelling Stop'; modern NR is anti-populist on personal conduct and institutional norms, pro-free-market, pro-life, hawkish on Russia/China, and pro-legal-immigration. NR ran the 'Against Trump' issue in 2016 and has remained critical of MAGA excess. Paxton hits some planks (taxes, abortion, guns) but flunks NR's anti-Trump, anti-populist, pro-Ukraine, pro-trade, and pro-institutionalist standards. Talarico is too far left on taxes, healthcare, marijuana, and economic policy to satisfy NR's free-market orthodoxy. Both stuck at 3 — the magazine that defined post-war conservatism can't bring itself to score either candidate above middling, which is itself an editorial verdict on the 2026 GOP.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)