A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
National Review (Buckley fusionism) portrait
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

National Review (Buckley fusionism)

SPC 5 Bert Goulait, US Military. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

Buckley-era fusionism: free markets, traditional social policy, hawkish foreign policy, pro-legal-immigration, institutionalist. NR's 'Against Trump' issue (2016) and ongoing anti-MAGA editorial line are central. Paxton hits taxes, abortion, and guns but flunks NR's anti-Trump, anti-populist, pro-Ukraine, pro-trade, and pro-institutionalist standards. Talarico is too far left on taxes, healthcare, marijuana, and economic policy. Both stuck at 3 — itself NR's editorial verdict on the 2026 GOP.

3
Margin
tie
Issue
Paxton
Talarico
Tax cuts
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
NR's free-market leg of the fusionist stool wants low rates; Paxton backs tax cuts1, while Talarico supports raising the corporate rate and a billionaire-tax framework2.
Pro-life
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
NR has been pro-life since Buckley; Paxton has aggressively defended Texas's abortion ban1, while Talarico supports restoring Roe-era protections2.
Second Amendment
Helps
Hurts
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: Hurts
NR treats gun rights as a core constitutional issue; Paxton's record aligns1, while Talarico's gun-safety expansions2 push the other way.
Anti-Trump / anti-MAGA
Hurts
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: —
NR ran 'Against Trump' in 2016 and has stayed critical of MAGA excess; Paxton is the Trump-endorsed candidate and runs on that alignment. Talarico is not in MAGA's orbit and is not the relevant counterweight here.
Personal conduct / institutional norms
Hurts
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: —
Post-Buckley NR has held that personal conduct and rule-following matter; Paxton's impeachment, settled 2024 securities case, and AG-office controversies are exactly what NR flags. Talarico carries no comparable record.
Pro-Ukraine / hawkish on Russia and China
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
NR is reliably hawkish on Russia and China and pro-Ukraine aid; Paxton's MAGA-aligned posture cuts against Ukraine support, while Talarico's explicit Ukraine-aid support and China-hawkish chip-export-controls position2 land him on the NR side of this row.
Free trade / anti-tariff
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
NR is doctrinaire pro-free-trade; Paxton has echoed Trump tariff support1, while Talarico backs tariff repeal2 — the rare case where the Democrat lands closer to NR.
Pro-legal-immigration
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
NR supports robust legal immigration; Paxton has sued to end DACA and prioritized enforcement1, while Talarico backs comprehensive reform with legal pathways2.
Pro-institutionalist / rule of law
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
NR prizes institutional norms and the rule of law; Paxton's AG record reads as institutional erosion, while Talarico's anti-corruption and ethics-reform package2 reads as institutional repair.
Medicare buy-in / healthcare expansion
Hurts
Paxton: — · Talarico: Hurts
NR opposes single-payer-leaning expansions; Talarico's Medicare buy-in at any age2 is exactly the policy NR critiques. Paxton aligns with NR — opposed — and is not a factor against him here.
Marijuana legalization
Hurts
Paxton: — · Talarico: Hurts
NR has been skeptical of broad legalization on social-fabric grounds; Talarico backs legalization2. Paxton aligns with NR — opposed — and is unaffected.
Minimum-wage hikes / economic policy
Hurts
Paxton: — · Talarico: Hurts
NR's free-market orthodoxy resists federal wage mandates and expanded labor-market intervention; Talarico backs a $15 minimum and the PRO Act2. Paxton aligns with NR and is not a factor.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)