A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
O'Connor, Sandra Day1930–2023 portrait
Scoring · Jurists

O'Connor, Sandra Day
1930–2023

Library of Congress (Transferred by Sven Manguard,. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

O'Connor's framework — Reagan's first SCOTUS appointee, the Rehnquist Court's swing vote, author of the Casey plurality preserving Roe under stare decisis, founder of iCivics in 2009 for civic education, and the last-decade speeches defending judicial independence60 — runs against Paxton's institutional pressure on the courts (Texas v. Pennsylvania asking SCOTUS to overturn election results, the documented forum-shopping practices, the State Bar professional-misconduct case) and is functionally implemented by Talarico's SCOTUS ethics-code, financial-disclosure, gift-limit, and judicial-independence package, with two points off Talarico for the federalism strain of his more expansive economic policies.

2
Margin
T +4
Issue
Paxton
Talarico
Judicial independence under political pressure
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
O'Connor's last-decade speeches warned judicial independence was under threat from political pressure; Paxton's Texas v. Pennsylvania lawsuit asking SCOTUS to overturn democratic election results is the precise institutional pressure she named, while Talarico's SCOTUS ethics, recusal, and judicial-independence package2 is functionally an O'Connor-framework implementation.
Legal-ethics / professional integrity
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
O'Connor championed legal-ethics integrity as a load-bearing professional norm; Paxton's State Bar professional-misconduct case52 is the embodiment of what that framework rejects, while Talarico's financial-disclosure and gift-limit package2 codifies the ethics framework O'Connor advanced.
Forum-shopping / neutral process
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
O'Connor's institutional-restraint framework treats neutral judicial process as foundational; the forum-shopping documented by Tribune/ProPublica5 is exactly the kind of process manipulation O'Connor opposed, while Talarico's judicial-process reforms (random case-assignment rules, division-shopping limits)2 target the same process-neutrality concern O'Connor championed.
Casey plurality / stare decisis / abortion
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
O'Connor co-authored the Casey plurality preserving Roe under stare decisis;60 Paxton's full anti-abortion litigation posture1 cuts directly against the precedent O'Connor protected, while Talarico's codify-Roe position2 aligns with the Casey framework.
Civic education / constitutional literacy (iCivics)
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
O'Connor founded iCivics in 200960 to address the erosion of constitutional literacy; Talarico's former-teacher framing and public-education-investment platform2 tracks O'Connor's civic-education commitment, while Paxton's Texas v. Pennsylvania election challenge and broader election-denial posture model the constitutional-literacy erosion O'Connor founded iCivics to combat.
Centrist-Republican temperament
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
O'Connor's institutionalist-Republican temperament was defined by restraint and cross-coalition reasoning; Paxton's factional style is its opposite, while Talarico's temperament is the closer match to O'Connor's framework even across party lines.
Federalism / legislative-reach limits
Mixed
Hurts
Paxton: Mixed · Talarico: Hurts
O'Connor spent her career navigating federalism limits on legislative reach; Talarico's more expansive federal economic agenda is the kind of legislative reach she would have flagged as federalism-straining, costing him a couple of points. Paxton's federalism record is genuinely mixed for O'Connor's framework — his state-AG litigation against federal agency overreach1 is the kind of state-sovereignty assertion her federalism credits, but his Texas v. Pennsylvania suit asking the Supreme Court to police another state's elections and his expansive theories of state-AG authority cut against the structural-federalism restraint she insisted on.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. Texas Tribune / ProPublica, 'Paxton files lawsuits in courts that could have more favorable outcomes,' May 20, 2026. (full list)
  4. State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr., professional misconduct case filed 2022 over Texas v. Pennsylvania (2020) election lawsuit; Texas Supreme Court procedural rulings 2024-2026; State Bar of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. (full list)
  5. Sandra Day O'Connor, 'The Majesty of the Law' (2003); Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992); founding of iCivics (2009); public speeches on judicial independence (2010-2020); 'Out of Order: Stories from the History of the Supreme Court' (2013). (full list)