A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

Forbes Magazine

7
Margin
A +4

Forbes's editorial framework — pro-growth, low-tax, light-touch regulation, deal-friendly, Steve Forbes-flat-tax-flavored — aligns Abbott on the $18B property-tax cut, the franchise-tax reductions, the R&D credit overhaul, the veteran-business franchise-tax exemption, and Texas's continuing top-state-for-business rankings. Abbott loses limited Forbes credit on the Trump-tariff defense (Forbes editorial tilt is pro-trade) and on the Tactical Border Force expansion. Hinojosa runs against Forbes on her 'tax the billionaires' framing, her stated minimum-wage-raise support, and her data-center cost-allocation framing. Forbes endorses no candidates, but its editorial framework is substantially Abbott-aligned. Abbott is the substantially closer Forbes fit.

Sources

  1. Patrick Svitek, 'Gov. Greg Abbott signs $18 billion property tax cut into law,' Texas Tribune, July 22, 2023. (full list)
  2. Office of the Governor, 'Governor Abbott signs laws to bolster Texas small businesses.' (full list)
  3. CBS News Texas, 'Gov. Abbott says Trump uses tariffs as leverage to boost border security,' CBS News Texas, Feb. 2025. (full list)
  4. E&E News, 'Spiraling energy costs may tighten Texas governor's race,' 2026. (full list)
  5. Forbes editorial tradition: pro-growth, low-tax, free-market frame; Steve Forbes flat-tax advocacy. (full list)