A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

AARP

4
Margin
H +2

AARP's framework — Social Security protection, Medicare strengthening, prescription-drug pricing reform, long-term-care funding, and protection against age-targeted scams — finds limited state-level leverage but real Texas-specific stakes. Abbott's record on rural hospital and rural mental-health construction grants ($1.4B federal funding, $239M HHSC grants) earns AARP credit, but the IDD-institutionalization lawsuit and Medicaid-refusal cut against AARP's elder-LTSS framework. Hinojosa's Medicaid-expansion priority, her anti-private-equity-nursing-home framing, and her drug-pricing-targeting language all align with AARP's published priorities. AARP rarely endorses but its scorecard would score the Medicaid-expansion fight heavily in Hinojosa's favor. Hinojosa is moderately the closer AARP fit.

Sources

  1. Office of the Governor, 'Governor Abbott announces historic $1.4 billion in federal funding secured for rural Texas Strong projects.' (full list)
  2. Texas Tribune, 'Federal judge: Texas illegally institutionalizing people with intellectual and developmental disabilities,' June 20, 2025. (full list)
  3. Governing, 'Texas governor still won't expand Medicaid,' archived analysis of Abbott's repeated rejection of Medicaid expansion. (full list)
  4. CBS Austin, 'Dem nominee for governor Gina Hinojosa weighs in on school budget crises and immigration,' March 2026. (full list)
  5. AARP, public-policy framework on Social Security, Medicare, prescription drug pricing, and long-term care. (full list)