A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Institutions & organizations

Cato Institute

5
Margin
tie

Cato favors free markets, free trade, civil liberties, criminal-justice reform, drug-policy reform, dovish foreign policy, executive-power skepticism, and pro-legal (often near-open) immigration. Abbott earns Cato credit on tax cuts, deregulation, Second Amendment, and school choice (SB 2) — substantial — but loses on Operation Lone Star's expansion of state coercive capacity, on the Trump-tariff defense (Cato is staunchly free-trade), on the Ten Commandments / church-state package, on permitless carry being paired with the SB 1362 preemptive ban on extreme-risk protection orders (Cato is generally civil-liberties-positive), and on cannabis prohibition (Cato favors legalization, Abbott's June 2025 veto is the smallest possible Cato-aligned move). Hinojosa earns Cato credit on cannabis-decriminalization bills (HB 81, HB 2107), on legal-immigration humaneness, and on civil-liberties votes (SB 10, SB 17). Both candidates pick up substantial partial credit; Abbott slightly higher overall.

Sources

  1. Sergio Martínez-Beltrán, 'Abbott signs $1 billion school voucher ESA law,' KUT, May 2, 2025. (full list)
  2. CBS News Texas, 'Gov. Abbott says Trump uses tariffs as leverage to boost border security,' CBS News Texas, Feb. 2025. (full list)
  3. NORML, vote scorecard and candidate page for Gina Hinojosa — covers HB 2107, HB 81, HB 122, HB 1535, and SB 3 votes. (full list)
  4. 'Gina Hinojosa,' Wikipedia, accessed May 2026 — legislative record including HB 73 gay/trans panic defense ban. (full list)
  5. Cato Institute: free markets, free trade, civil liberties, criminal-justice reform, dovish foreign policy, executive-power skepticism. (full list)