A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Public intellectuals

Sowell, Thomas
1930–

6
Margin
A +3

Sowell's framework — markets over central planning, race-neutral analysis, school choice, and skepticism of government-led redistribution — aligns Abbott on vouchers (SB 2), on light-touch regulation, on opposition to federal Medicaid expansion, and on the family-as-policy-unit framing. Hinojosa runs against Sowell on Medicaid expansion, corporate-tax framing, and union-friendly posture. Sowell is also famously skeptical of identity-politics framing in social policy — a point that cuts against Hinojosa's frequent 'billionaire class' framing but doesn't necessarily map cleanly to either candidate's institutional record. Abbott is the substantially closer Sowell fit; Hinojosa picks up partial credit only on the family-stability strand of Sowell's writing.

Sources

  1. Sergio Martínez-Beltrán, 'Abbott signs $1 billion school voucher ESA law,' KUT, May 2, 2025. (full list)
  2. Governing, 'Texas governor still won't expand Medicaid,' archived analysis of Abbott's repeated rejection of Medicaid expansion. (full list)
  3. Texas Observer, 'Gina Hinojosa's campaign for Texas governor,' 2025 — quotes Hinojosa on corruption and Operation Lone Star. (full list)
  4. Gina Hinojosa for Texas Governor, official campaign priorities page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  5. Thomas Sowell, A Conflict of Visions (1987); Basic Economics; Race and Culture trilogy. (full list)