A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Public intellectuals

Sagan, Carl
1934–1996

2
Margin
H +4

Sagan's framework — scientific literacy, climate-policy seriousness, opposition to nuclear escalation, defense of expertise against political interference — reads in 2026 as ERCOT grid-reliability seriousness, public-health expert deference (vaccines, COVID), and climate-policy seriousness. Abbott's initial mis-blame of wind turbines for Winter Storm Uri (contradicted by data), his Executive Order GA-40 opposing federal vaccine mandates, his hands-off posture on data-center grid load (which displaces residential capacity), and his READER Act book-rating mandate (a 'pervasively vulgar' standard publishers struggle to interpret) all run against Sagan. Hinojosa's grid-reliability listening-tour partnership, her data-center load critique grounded in $600/year ratepayer estimates, and her TRAIGA-style algorithmic-accountability framing align with Sagan. Hinojosa is the substantially closer fit.

Sources

  1. Erin Douglas and Mitchell Ferman, 'Greg Abbott took control of the state power grid. Here's how it has fared,' Texas Tribune, Dec. 28, 2021. (full list)
  2. '2021 Texas power crisis,' Wikipedia, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. E&E News, 'Spiraling energy costs may tighten Texas governor's race,' 2026. (full list)
  4. Brian Lopez, 'Texas House passes library book restrictions; Hinojosa and Talarico oppose in committee,' Texas Tribune, April 19, 2023. (full list)
  5. Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World (1995); Cosmos (1980); scientific-literacy advocacy. (full list)