A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Jurists

O'Connor, Sandra Day
1930–2023

3
Margin
H +3

O'Connor's defining jurisprudence — Casey's preservation of Roe's core, Grutter's narrowly-tailored race-conscious admissions, Lawrence-era social-issue centrism, and her later iCivics work emphasizing institutional civic education — reads as moderating, pluralism-preserving conservatism. Abbott runs hard against the O'Connor frame on abortion (SB 8, the trigger ban), on church-state (SB 10/11/763), on LGBTQ (SB 14/15/12, the 2022 DFPS investigation directive), and on civics-education-style pluralism. Hinojosa's no-votes on each of those bills track the O'Connor strand; her Public Benefit Corporations bill is a moderating civic-institutional invention of the sort O'Connor's iCivics work would celebrate. Hinojosa is the substantially closer O'Connor fit; Abbott picks up some O'Connor credit only on the federalism-and-property-rights strand.

Sources

  1. Eleanor Klibanoff, 'Gov. Greg Abbott signs into law one of nation's strictest abortion bans,' Texas Tribune, May 19, 2021. (full list)
  2. Texas Tribune, 'Ten Commandments in Texas schools: SB 10 explained,' May 24, 2025. (full list)
  3. Eleanor Klibanoff, 'Texas bans gender-affirming care for trans minors,' Texas Tribune, June 2, 2023. (full list)
  4. Texas AFT, 'SB 12, the Parents Bill of Rights, deep dive,' 2025 — pronoun, DEI, and GSA provisions. (full list)
  5. Sandra Day O'Connor, jurisprudence as the Court's pivotal centrist; iCivics; Planned Parenthood v. Casey concurrence. (full list)