A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Scoring · Business leaders

Dimon, Jamie
1956–

2
Margin
T +3

Dimon's annual shareholder letters from 2019-2026 have become a de facto state-of-the-establishment-Republican-business-world address — his documented positions include pro-immigration reform, pro-infrastructure investment, pro-Ukraine, pro-NATO, anti-populist-extremism (on both sides), fiscal-hawk-but-pragmatic, and deeply concerned about American institutional decline. Dimon spent the Trump years explicitly warning the GOP against the populist nationalism Paxton embodies; the tariff position, the institutional corruption, the Ukraine skepticism, the attacks on financial regulators, and the personal-conduct scandals are all Dimon's stated worry list. Talarico's institutionalism, immigration reform framework, alliance restoration posture, anti-corruption package, and infrastructure investment would land well with Dimon. Dimon would push back on the corporate tax increases, stock buyback tax, billionaire-taxation framing, and the $15 federal minimum wage as economically counterproductive. The 2 for Paxton reflects how thoroughly the establishment-Republican business voice has rejected the Trump-era populist GOP — Dimon is the closest living equivalent to the National Review founding ethos, and like NR he rates Paxton near the bottom.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase annual shareholder letters 2019-2026; public statements on immigration reform, infrastructure, Ukraine, and institutional decline; congressional testimony on banking regulation. (full list)