A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Founding fathers

Washington, George
1789–1797

3
Margin
H +2

Washington's defining warnings — against faction, against demagogic appeals to tribe over country, against using executive office for partisan ends, and against entangling foreign alliances — are tested in 2026 Texas politics. Abbott's Yass $6 million donation funding primary challenges against House Republicans who crossed him, his August 2025 DPS-arrest order against Democratic legislators, and his open partisan alignment with Trump on Ukraine ('Joe Biden needs to stop giving money to foreign countries') sit poorly with Washington's anti-faction frame. Hinojosa's quorum break is itself a faction move, but conducted to defend institutional process against partisan gerrymandering; her corporate-PAC refusal and small-donation profile track Washington's posture more cleanly. Neither candidate matches Washington's anti-faction discipline, but Hinojosa's structural posture is closer.

Sources

  1. Patrick Svitek, 'Greg Abbott and Tim Dunn back primary challenges to House Republicans who blocked vouchers,' Texas Tribune, Feb. 27, 2024. (full list)
  2. Texas Tribune, 'Abbott threatens removal of Democrats who broke quorum to block redistricting,' Aug. 3, 2025. (full list)
  3. Gov. Greg Abbott, X (formerly Twitter), 'Joe Biden needs to stop giving money to foreign countries like Ukraine.' 2025. (full list)
  4. Texas Observer, 'Gina Hinojosa's campaign for Texas governor,' 2025 — quotes Hinojosa on corruption and Operation Lone Star. (full list)
  5. George Washington, Farewell Address (1796); warnings against faction and foreign entanglement. (full list)