How They DifferPaxton · Talarico 2026
A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Paxton 2.7Talarico 6.1 T +3.4
Scoring · Interests by life stage

Interests of an 18-Year-Old

An 18-year-old voting for the first time in November 2026 leads with college cost, climate, housing, gun violence (10 during Uvalde), reproductive freedom, LGBTQ acceptance, and democracy. Talarico's platform is a direct address — Wall Street housing ban, AR-21, marijuana, anti-book-ban, anti-billionaire, seminarian rejecting Christian Nationalism.2 Paxton picks up one point with religious conservatives. Widest age-bracket gap on the board.

Paxton
1
Talarico
9
Margin
T +8
Issue
Paxton
Talarico
Cost of college and student debt
—
Helps
Paxton: — · Talarico: Helps
Talarico's anti-billionaire / tax-fairness framing is paired with a stated affordability platform; Paxton's voucher push and broader fiscal posture do not engage tuition or federal student debt for this 18-year-old.
Climate change
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Paxton's anti-ESG litigation1 works directly against the climate-concern this cohort cites at the top of its list; Talarico aligns with the climate-action framing they say they want2.
Housing affordability
—
Helps
Paxton: — · Talarico: Helps
Talarico's plan to ban Wall Street from buying single-family homes, expand LIHTC, and back modular construction2 targets the cohort's housing concern; Paxton has no published Senate plank on housing.
Gun violence on campus (active-shooter generation)
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
This cohort grew up with active-shooter drills and were 10 during Uvalde; Talarico's proposal to raise AR-style purchase age to 2122 speaks directly to them, while Paxton's ATF and gun-rights litigation1 moves the other direction.
Reproductive freedom
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Talarico's defense of reproductive freedom2 matches the cohort's stated position; Paxton's abortion-prosecution and anti-abortion record1 runs against it.
LGBTQ acceptance
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Paxton's litigation history runs against the cohort's LGBTQ-acceptance baseline; Talarico aligns with it.
Marijuana legalization
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Talarico explicitly backs marijuana legalization2, matching the cohort's clear preference, while Paxton's enforcement-first posture runs opposite on this exact issue.
Book bans
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Talarico's opposition to book bans2 aligns with the cohort's LGBTQ/free-expression baseline, while Paxton's alignment with the pro-removal side of the Texas school-library fights cuts the other way on this specific issue.
Cost of living and tariffs
Hurts
Helps
Paxton: Hurts · Talarico: Helps
Paxton's tariff support1 raises the cost of living for an 18-year-old buying everything in retail, while Talarico's tariff-repeal posture2 pulls the other direction on cost of living.
Anti-billionaire / democracy framing
—
Helps
Paxton: — · Talarico: Helps
Talarico's anti-billionaire framing and 'does democracy still work' posture map to this cohort's stated concerns; Paxton's institutional record does not register positively here.
Religious-conservative 18-year-olds
Helps
—
Paxton: Helps · Talarico: —
Paxton speaks the language of 18-year-old conservatives raised in deeply religious households — the lone point in his column on this grader.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Talarico for Texas, official campaign issues pages (taxes, education, healthcare, immigration, social media/AI, freedom-family-faith, public-safety-justice, corruption-democracy, labor-business), accessed May 2026. (full list)
  3. Texas House floor speech on HB 2960, May 2023, post-Allen mall shooting; Daily Caller News Foundation analysis, March 2026. (full list)

Others in this cluster