A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Cornyn 5.1Paxton 2.7 C +2.4
Scoring · Public intellectuals

Sowell, Thomas
1930–

6
4
Margin
C +2

Thomas Sowell's framework distinguishes between the 'constrained vision' (humans as limited, institutions as accumulated wisdom, markets as information-aggregation) and the 'unconstrained vision' (humans as perfectible, institutions as obstacles, planning as feasible) — his whole career has been a sustained defense of the constrained vision. Cornyn fits Sowell's constrained-vision framework substantially better than Paxton: his institutional respect, free-trade record, school-choice support, and clean process record (no forum-shopping investigations, no State Bar misconduct, no impeachment) satisfy the institutional-integrity commitment Sowell treats as foundational. Paxton's substantive policy positions track Sowell's policy preferences but the forum-shopping and personal-conduct record violate the institutional-integrity framework Sowell treats as separable but essential.

Sources

  1. Sen. John Cornyn, official Senate website and 2026 re-election campaign issues page, accessed May 2026 (cornyn.senate.gov; johncornyn.com). (full list)
  2. Texas Tribune / ProPublica, 'Paxton files lawsuits in courts that could have more favorable outcomes,' May 20, 2026. (full list)
  3. State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr., professional misconduct case filed 2022 over Texas v. Pennsylvania (2020) election lawsuit; Texas Supreme Court procedural rulings 2024-2026; State Bar of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. (full list)
  4. Thomas Sowell, 'A Conflict of Visions' (1987); 'Basic Economics' (2000); 'Ethnic America' (1981); 'Knowledge and Decisions' (1980); 'Discrimination and Disparities' (2018); decades of syndicated columns; Hoover Institution senior fellow record. (full list)