A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Cornyn 5.1Paxton 2.7 C +2.4
Scoring · Public intellectuals

Friedman, Milton
1912–2006

5
4
Margin
C +1

Milton Friedman's framework was free-market absolutism: school vouchers (he invented the modern framework in 1955), drug legalization, free trade, deregulation, and skepticism of government-led economic planning. Both candidates align with Friedman on school vouchers, deregulation, and tax cuts. Cornyn earns more Friedman credit on the centerpiece free-trade position (Friedman was the foremost free-trade advocate of his generation, and Cornyn's USMCA-and-anti-tariff record is far closer to Friedman than Paxton's tariff alignment), and on the classical-liberal institutional-process commitment Paxton's forum-shopping violates. Both lose on Friedman's drug-legalization framework. Friedman's substantive economic policy framework leans rightward but his commitment to neutral methodology and free trade gives Cornyn the edge.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Sen. John Cornyn, official Senate website and 2026 re-election campaign issues page, accessed May 2026 (cornyn.senate.gov; johncornyn.com). (full list)
  3. Cornyn votes on USMCA (January 2020); Senate Finance Committee record on free-trade agreements; Cornyn statements on Trump-era tariffs (2018-2026) including measured opposition to broad agricultural tariffs harming Texas exporters. (full list)
  4. Milton Friedman, 'Capitalism and Freedom' (1962); 'Free to Choose' (1980, with Rose Friedman); 'The Role of Government in Education' (1955, establishing the school-voucher framework); Nobel Prize in Economics (1976); Wall Street Journal columns and Newsweek columns 1966-1984. (full list)