A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Cornyn 5.1Paxton 2.7 C +2.4
Scoring · Founding fathers

Jefferson, Thomas
1801–1809

5
4
Margin
C +1

Jefferson was the founders' most absolute defender of church-state separation (the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom protected 'the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mahometan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination'), a free-press absolutist, agrarian-republican, and anti-Hamilton-banking. Cornyn fits Jefferson better than Paxton on the church-state dimension — no Ten Commandments mandate co-sponsorship, no religious-minority-targeting litigation, and his RFMA vote provides federal conscience protection. Paxton's Ten Commandments championship and CAIR litigation are the precise practice Jefferson's Statute and Danbury Baptist letter were built to prohibit; Jefferson explicitly protected Muslims from state interference. The two candidates align on states-rights and anti-large-federal-government posture, but the church-state chasm is wide. Cornyn is the more Jeffersonian Republican on the church-state core of Jefferson's framework.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Sen. John Cornyn, official Senate website and 2026 re-election campaign issues page, accessed May 2026 (cornyn.senate.gov; johncornyn.com). (full list)
  3. Texas Attorney General actions against CAIR, East Plano Islamic Center, and Catholic Annunciation House; ABC News and Tribune coverage, 2024-2026. (full list)
  4. Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (drafted 1777, enacted 1786); 'Wall of Separation' letter to Danbury Baptists (1802); Notes on the State of Virginia; Louisiana Purchase (1803). (full list)