A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Cornyn 5.1Paxton 2.7 C +2.4
Scoring · Founding fathers

Hamilton, Alexander
1755–1804

6
3
Margin
C +3

Hamilton was the founders' strongest advocate for federal power, banking regulation, manufacturing, urban-commercial pragmatism, and pro-immigration (he himself arrived in NYC at 17 as a Caribbean immigrant); his Federalist Papers are the definitive constitutional defense of energetic federal government and a sustained warning against demagogues. Cornyn matches Hamilton substantially better than Paxton: the CHIPS Act and industrial-policy posture is direct Hamiltonian industrial-policy lineage, his Senate-Banking-Committee record on financial regulation aligns with Hamilton's banking-regulation framework, and his consistent institutionalism is the anti-demagogue posture Hamilton built the Federalist Papers around. Paxton's populist-demagogic mode is exactly what Hamilton warned against, and the personal-attack campaign style would horrify the man who died in a duel triggered by exactly such attacks.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Sen. John Cornyn, official Senate website and 2026 re-election campaign issues page, accessed May 2026 (cornyn.senate.gov; johncornyn.com). (full list)
  3. Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers (1787-1788) Nos. 1, 6-9, 11-13, 15-17, 21-36, 59-61, 65-85; Report on Manufactures (1791); Report on Public Credit (1790); critique of Aaron Burr (1804 letters). (full list)