A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Later presidents

Roosevelt, Theodore
1901–1909

3
Margin
H +3

TR's New Nationalism — the 'malefactors of great wealth,' the Sherman Act enforcement, food and drug safety, and a strong-state corrective to corporate excess — is the cleanest progressive-Republican lens. Abbott's relationships with mega-donors (Yass's $6M, Tim Dunn's voucher-pushing political infrastructure) and his hands-off data-center cost-shifting posture sit against TR's frame. Hinojosa's 'fight against the billionaires and the corporations who are driving up prices' launch speech, her data-center cost-shifting critique, and her targeting of private-equity acquisitions of healthcare facilities are the cleanest 2026 echoes of TR's anti-trust rhetoric. On TR's conservation strand both candidates are thin — Abbott has signed property-rights bills that favor extraction; Hinojosa centers water reliability. Hinojosa is the closer New Nationalism fit.

Sources

  1. Patrick Svitek, 'Greg Abbott and Tim Dunn back primary challenges to House Republicans who blocked vouchers,' Texas Tribune, Feb. 27, 2024. (full list)
  2. E&E News, 'Spiraling energy costs may tighten Texas governor's race,' 2026. (full list)
  3. KFOX, 'Gina Hinojosa launches campaign for Texas governor, targets water access and schools,' 2025. (full list)
  4. Texas Observer, 'Gina Hinojosa's campaign for Texas governor,' 2025 — quotes Hinojosa on corruption and Operation Lone Star. (full list)
  5. Theodore Roosevelt, New Nationalism speech (1910); trust-busting record; Bull Moose platform. (full list)