A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Abbott 3.9Hinojosa 5.4 H +1.5
Scoring · Interests by life stage

Interests of a 65-Year-Old

4
Margin
H +2

A 65-year-old's interests are Social Security, Medicare, prescription-drug pricing, rural-hospital availability, elder-care quality (nursing homes, in-home services), and protection against age-targeted scams. Both candidates have limited direct authority over federal Social Security/Medicare. On state-level levers: Abbott has touted $1.4B in federal rural-health funding and $239M in HHSC mental-health construction grants — real wins for the 65-year-old. But the IDD-institutionalization lawsuit and Medicaid-refusal hurt the lower-income elderly. Hinojosa's Medicaid-expansion priority directly benefits the 65-year-old (especially for those between job loss and Medicare eligibility), her anti-private-equity-healthcare framing targets nursing-home consolidation, and her water-reliability priority matters for fixed-income retirees. Both candidates pick up partial credit; Hinojosa moderately closer on the healthcare-and-pricing strands.

Sources

  1. Office of the Governor, 'Governor Abbott announces historic $1.4 billion in federal funding secured for rural Texas Strong projects.' (full list)
  2. Office of the Governor, 'Governor Abbott announces $239 million in construction grants for mental health care in rural Texas,' March 2025. (full list)
  3. Governing, 'Texas governor still won't expand Medicaid,' archived analysis of Abbott's repeated rejection of Medicaid expansion. (full list)
  4. Texas Tribune, 'Federal judge: Texas illegally institutionalizing people with intellectual and developmental disabilities,' June 20, 2025. (full list)
  5. The Arc of Texas, 'Medicaid waivers' resource page — IDD waiver waitlists and home-and-community-based services data. (full list)