A no bullshit non-partisan comparison of political candidates
Aggregate score
Cornyn 5.1Paxton 2.7 C +2.4
Scoring · Later presidents

Roosevelt, Franklin D.
1933–1945

3
1
Margin
C +2

FDR's framework — the New Deal social-insurance state, the Four Freedoms (including 'freedom from want'), and the Atlantic Charter alliance-building — is the most expansive defense of activist federal government in American presidential history, paired with rhetoric treating economic oligarchy as a threat to democracy. Both candidates are too conservative on the social-insurance core for FDR's framework, but Cornyn earns substantial FDR credit on the alliance-keeping Atlantic-Charter dimension: his pro-Ukraine, pro-NATO, pro-AUKUS record is direct FDR-wartime-coalition tradition. Paxton's MAGA tariff-and-isolationism posture with Ukraine-aid skepticism cuts against the Lend-Lease and Atlantic Charter internationalism FDR built American foreign policy around. Both lose on the New-Deal-domestic side; Cornyn is the closer alliance-tradition fit.

Sources

  1. Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, official campaign issues page, accessed May 2026. (full list)
  2. Sen. John Cornyn, official Senate website and 2026 re-election campaign issues page, accessed May 2026 (cornyn.senate.gov; johncornyn.com). (full list)
  3. Cornyn votes on Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations (April 2024, $61B package); Cornyn statements on Israel aid and Iron Dome funding; Senate Foreign Relations Committee record on NATO and AUKUS. (full list)
  4. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Four Freedoms address to Congress (Jan. 6, 1941); Second Bill of Rights / 1944 State of the Union; Wagner Act (1935); Social Security Act (1935); Fair Labor Standards Act (1938); SEC and Glass-Steagall (1933-1934); Atlantic Charter (1941); 1936 Democratic Convention 'economic royalists' speech; 1938 'Public Power' message on private power versus democratic government. (full list)